When peer reviewing there are two major strategies that can be employed, global edits, and local edits. Global edits are more in depth, broader idea of peer reviewing whereas local edits are more specific tweaks in a paper.  When I was reviewing I got the impression that global edits can be more helpful but are definitely harder. Local editing is much simpler and easier to do. I fell as though I would want more global edits if somebody was reviewing my paper. Two brains focused on ideas is very efficient. My global edits seemed repetitive focused on finding good ideas in the reading. I tried to not worry about the local edits as much as the global edits even though my brain is geared towards them. Local edits are very easy but do not have the weight of global edits to me. It almost is like the brain is hardwired to find grammatical errors and sentence structure problems while reading. I found myself circling repeating words and noticing sentence structure a lot, but tried to refrain from paying too much attention to that. When writing an essay I think that more global edits should be done first after the first draft and local edits should be heavier one the final draft is done as a cleaning tool.